Wikipedia articles on nutrition: Are they accurate and complete?

Norman J. Temple

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Background: There is controversy regarding whether Wikipedia entries in the area of health-related topics are accurate and complete. Objective: To investigate the accuracy and completeness of Wikipedia entries on nutrition. Methods: Fifty-three accurate statements were formulated. Topics covered diverse areas of nutrition. One or more search terms were developed for each statement. Wikipedia entries were identified using Google for 89 search terms. These were graded for level of accuracy and completeness. Results: The entries for 73.5% of the statements had high scores (at most only minor problems were seen). The entries for 18.9% of the statements had a lesser degree of accuracy and completeness; the most common problem was that at least one entry for a statement provided no information on the statement. Serious problems of missing information were seen with the entries for 7.6% of the statements. No errors were found in any Wikipedia entries. Conclusion: While Wikipedia entries in the area of nutrition are quite accurate and free of errors, important information is often missing. Nutrition professionals should be discouraged from relying on Wikipedia. These findings are broadly consistent with other studies of Wikipedia entries in health-related areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-240
Number of pages4
JournalCurrent Nutrition and Food Science
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2020


  • Accuracy and completeness
  • Diet information
  • Health information
  • Health-related topics
  • Nutrition information
  • Wikipedia


Dive into the research topics of 'Wikipedia articles on nutrition: Are they accurate and complete?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this