TY - JOUR
T1 - Wikipedia articles on nutrition
T2 - Are they accurate and complete?
AU - Temple, Norman J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Bentham Science Publishers.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: There is controversy regarding whether Wikipedia entries in the area of health-related topics are accurate and complete. Objective: To investigate the accuracy and completeness of Wikipedia entries on nutrition. Methods: Fifty-three accurate statements were formulated. Topics covered diverse areas of nutrition. One or more search terms were developed for each statement. Wikipedia entries were identified using Google for 89 search terms. These were graded for level of accuracy and completeness. Results: The entries for 73.5% of the statements had high scores (at most only minor problems were seen). The entries for 18.9% of the statements had a lesser degree of accuracy and completeness; the most common problem was that at least one entry for a statement provided no information on the statement. Serious problems of missing information were seen with the entries for 7.6% of the statements. No errors were found in any Wikipedia entries. Conclusion: While Wikipedia entries in the area of nutrition are quite accurate and free of errors, important information is often missing. Nutrition professionals should be discouraged from relying on Wikipedia. These findings are broadly consistent with other studies of Wikipedia entries in health-related areas.
AB - Background: There is controversy regarding whether Wikipedia entries in the area of health-related topics are accurate and complete. Objective: To investigate the accuracy and completeness of Wikipedia entries on nutrition. Methods: Fifty-three accurate statements were formulated. Topics covered diverse areas of nutrition. One or more search terms were developed for each statement. Wikipedia entries were identified using Google for 89 search terms. These were graded for level of accuracy and completeness. Results: The entries for 73.5% of the statements had high scores (at most only minor problems were seen). The entries for 18.9% of the statements had a lesser degree of accuracy and completeness; the most common problem was that at least one entry for a statement provided no information on the statement. Serious problems of missing information were seen with the entries for 7.6% of the statements. No errors were found in any Wikipedia entries. Conclusion: While Wikipedia entries in the area of nutrition are quite accurate and free of errors, important information is often missing. Nutrition professionals should be discouraged from relying on Wikipedia. These findings are broadly consistent with other studies of Wikipedia entries in health-related areas.
KW - Accuracy and completeness
KW - Diet information
KW - Health information
KW - Health-related topics
KW - Nutrition information
KW - Wikipedia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081090857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2174/1573401314666180327095119
DO - 10.2174/1573401314666180327095119
M3 - Journal Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081090857
SN - 1573-4013
VL - 16
SP - 237
EP - 240
JO - Current Nutrition and Food Science
JF - Current Nutrition and Food Science
IS - 2
ER -