TY - JOUR
T1 - Unmasking the effects of orthography, semantics, and phonology on 2AFC visual word perceptual identification
AU - Kress, Shaylyn
AU - Neudorf, Josh
AU - Ekstrand, Chelsea
AU - Borowsky, Ron
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In the two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) task, the target stimulus is presented very briefly, and participants must choose which of two options was the presented target. Some past research has assumed that the 2AFC task isolates orthographic effects, despite orthographic, semantic, and phonological differences between the options. If so, performance should not differ between word/nonword pairs and British/American word pairs, the latter of which only differ orthographically. In Experiment 1, accuracy and sensitivity were higher during word/nonword trials than British/American trials when participants did not guess, demonstrating that phonological/semantic processing contributes to performance. Experiment 2 showed that target visibility did not interact with pair type on RT, which suggests phonological/semantic processing did not feed back to orthographic encoding in this task. This study demonstrates the influence of phonological/semantic processing on word perceptual identification, and shows that using British/American word pairs provides a method to isolate orthography in the 2AFC task.
AB - In the two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) task, the target stimulus is presented very briefly, and participants must choose which of two options was the presented target. Some past research has assumed that the 2AFC task isolates orthographic effects, despite orthographic, semantic, and phonological differences between the options. If so, performance should not differ between word/nonword pairs and British/American word pairs, the latter of which only differ orthographically. In Experiment 1, accuracy and sensitivity were higher during word/nonword trials than British/American trials when participants did not guess, demonstrating that phonological/semantic processing contributes to performance. Experiment 2 showed that target visibility did not interact with pair type on RT, which suggests phonological/semantic processing did not feed back to orthographic encoding in this task. This study demonstrates the influence of phonological/semantic processing on word perceptual identification, and shows that using British/American word pairs provides a method to isolate orthography in the 2AFC task.
KW - orthography
KW - phonology
KW - semantics
KW - two-alternative forced-choice
KW - Word perception
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85117252758
U2 - 10.1080/13506285.2021.1989099
DO - 10.1080/13506285.2021.1989099
M3 - Journal Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117252758
SN - 1350-6285
VL - 29
SP - 657
EP - 678
JO - Visual Cognition
JF - Visual Cognition
IS - 10
ER -