Abstract
In the two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) task, the target stimulus is presented very briefly, and participants must choose which of two options was the presented target. Some past research has assumed that the 2AFC task isolates orthographic effects, despite orthographic, semantic, and phonological differences between the options. If so, performance should not differ between word/nonword pairs and British/American word pairs, the latter of which only differ orthographically. In Experiment 1, accuracy and sensitivity were higher during word/nonword trials than British/American trials when participants did not guess, demonstrating that phonological/semantic processing contributes to performance. Experiment 2 showed that target visibility did not interact with pair type on RT, which suggests phonological/semantic processing did not feed back to orthographic encoding in this task. This study demonstrates the influence of phonological/semantic processing on word perceptual identification, and shows that using British/American word pairs provides a method to isolate orthography in the 2AFC task.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 657-678 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Visual Cognition |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- orthography
- phonology
- semantics
- two-alternative forced-choice
- Word perception
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Unmasking the effects of orthography, semantics, and phonology on 2AFC visual word perceptual identification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver