Trans-Neutrality in Intimate Partner Violence Service Provision in the USA and Canada

Lauren N. Moton, Stacie Merken, Danielle C. Slakoff, Wendy Aujla

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Trans women have distinct dynamics in abusive relationships that cisgender women may not experience (e.g., purposeful misgendering). Therefore, it is important that IPV service providers recognize the unique needs of trans women to provide appropriate care. We draw on data from a larger study employing an online open-ended survey with a hypothetical vignette depicting a trans woman experiencing IPV (Merken et al., 2023). Responses from 75 IPV service providers in the USA and Canada indicate that many respondents aim to “treat everyone equally” regardless of gender identity, but may do so based on the constraints of their organization. Drawing on colorblind racial ideology, we discuss the harms of generalized IPV service provision, or what we term trans-neutrality. We argue this perspective has harmful consequences for trans women seeking assistance and call for more structural support for service providers to implement sustained trans-inclusive IPV provision. Implications for IPV policy and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1007-1023
Number of pages17
JournalCritical Criminology
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec. 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trans-Neutrality in Intimate Partner Violence Service Provision in the USA and Canada'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this