The qualitative-quantitative debate: Moving from positivism and confrontation to post-positivism and reconciliation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

121 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Critiques of logical positivism form the foundation for a significant number of nursing research papers, with the philosophy being inappropriately deemed synonymous with empirical method. Frequently, proposing an alternative method to those identified with the quantitative paradigm, these critiques are based on a poor foundation. This paper highlights an alternative philosophy to positivism which can also underpin empirical inquiry, that of post-positivism. Post-positivism is contrasted with positivism, which is presented as an outmoded and rejected philosophy which should cease to significantly shape inquiry. Though some acknowledgement of post-positivism has occurred in the nursing literature, this has yet to permeate into mainstream nursing research. Many still base their arguments on a positivistic view of science. Through achievement of a better understanding of post-positivism and greater focus on explicating the philosophical assumptions underpinning all research methods, the distinctions that have long been perceived to exist between qualitative and quantitative methodologies can be confined to the past. Rather methods will be selected solely on the nature of research questions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1242-1249
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun. 1998

Keywords

  • Methodology
  • Paradigms
  • Philosophy
  • Research
  • Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The qualitative-quantitative debate: Moving from positivism and confrontation to post-positivism and reconciliation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this