The evolution of vaccine hesitancy through the COVID-19 pandemic: A semi-structured interview study on booster and bivalent doses

  • Jeanna Parsons Leigh
  • , Emily A. FitzGerald
  • , Stephana Julia Moss
  • , Michal S. Cherak
  • , Rebecca Brundin-Mather
  • , Alexandra Dodds
  • , Henry T. Stelfox
  • , Ève Dubé
  • , Kirsten M. Fiest
  • , Donna M. Halperin
  • , Sofia B. Ahmed
  • , Shannon E. MacDonald
  • , Sharon E. Straus
  • , Terra Manca
  • , Josh Ng Kamstra
  • , Andrea Soo
  • , Shelly Longmore
  • , Shelly Kupsch
  • , Bonnie Sept
  • , Scott A. Halperin

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We sought in-depth understanding on the evolution of factors influencing COVID-19 booster dose and bivalent vaccine hesitancy in a longitudinal semi-structured interview-based qualitative study. Serial interviews were conducted between July 25th and September 1st, 2022 (Phase I: univalent booster dose availability), and between November 21st, 2022 and January 11th, 2023 (Phase II: bivalent vaccine availability). Adults (≥18 years) in Canada who had received an initial primary series and had not received a COVID-19 booster dose were eligible for Phase I, and subsequently invited to participate in Phase II. Twenty-two of twenty-three (96%) participants completed interviews for both phases (45 interviews). Nearly half of participants identified as a woman (n = 11), the median age was 37 years (interquartile range: 32–48), and most participants were employed full-time (n = 12); no participant reported needing to vaccinate (with a primary series) for their workplace. No participant reported having received a COVID-19 booster dose at the time of their interview in Phase II. Three themes relating to the development of hesitancy toward continued vaccination against COVID-19 were identified: 1) effectiveness (frequency concerns; infection despite vaccination); 2) necessity (less threatening, low urgency, alternate protective measures); and 3) information (need for data, contradiction and confusion, lack of trust, decreased motivation). The data from interviews with individuals who had not received a COVID-19 booster dose or bivalent vaccine despite having received a primary series of COVID-19 vaccines highlights actionable targets to address vaccine hesitancy and improve public health literacy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2316417
JournalHuman Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Vaccine hesitancy
  • bivalent
  • booster
  • interviews
  • public

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The evolution of vaccine hesitancy through the COVID-19 pandemic: A semi-structured interview study on booster and bivalent doses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this