Study protocol for Attachment & Child Health (ATTACHTM) program: promoting vulnerable Children’s health at scale

Lubna Anis, Nicole Letourneau, Kharah M. Ross, Martha Hart, Ian Graham, Simone Lalonde, Suzanna Varro, Alanna Baldwin, Angela Soulsby, Annette Majnemer, Carlene Donnelly, Caroline Piotrowski, Carrie Collier, Cliff Lindeman, Dan Goldowitz, Dawn Isaac, Denise Thomson, Diane Serré, Elisabeth Citro, Gabrielle ZimmermannHarold Pliszka, Jackie Mann, Janine Baumann, Joanna Piekarski, Jo Anne Dalton, Joy Johnson-Green, Karen Wood, Marcia Bruce, Maria Santana, Matt Mayer, Meghan Gould, Michael Kobor, Michelle Flowers, Michelle Haywood, Michelle Koerner, Nancy Parker, Nazeem Muhajarine, Paul Fairie, Rabea Chrishti, Robert Perry, Sarah Merrill, Shellie Pociuk, StephanieTaylor, Steve Cole, Tim Murphy, Tmira Marchment, Virginia Xavier, Zahra Shajani, Zoe West

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Children’s exposure to toxic stress (e.g., parental depression, violence, poverty) predicts developmental and physical health problems resulting in health care system burden. Supporting parents to develop parenting skills can buffer the effects of toxic stress, leading to healthier outcomes for those children. Parenting interventions that focus on promoting parental reflective function (RF), i.e., parents’ capacity for insight into their child’s and their own thoughts, feelings, and mental states, may understand help reduce societal health inequities stemming from childhood stress exposures. The Attachment and Child Health (ATTACHTM) program has been implemented and tested in seven rapid-cycling pilot studies (n = 64) and found to significantly improve parents’ RF in the domains of attachment, parenting quality, immune function, and children’s cognitive and motor development. The purpose of the study is to conduct an effectiveness-implementation hybrid (EIH) Type II study of ATTACHTM to assess its impacts in naturalistic, real-world settings delivered by community agencies rather than researchers under more controlled conditions. Methods: The study is comprised of a quantitative pre/post-test quasi-experimental evaluation of the ATTACHTM program, and a qualitative examination of implementation feasibility using thematic analysis via Normalization Process Theory (NPT). We will work with 100 families and their children (birth to 36-months-old). Study outcomes include: the Parent Child Interaction Teaching Scale to assess parent-child interaction; the Parental Reflective Function and Reflective Function Questionnaires to assess RF; and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire – 3rd edition to examine child development, all administered pre-, post-, and 3-month-delayed post-assessment. Blood samples will be collected pre- and post- assessment to assess immune biomarkers. Further, we will conduct one-on-one interviews with study participants, health and social service providers, and administrators (total n = 60) from each collaborating agency, using NPT to explore perceptions and experiences of intervention uptake, the fidelity assessment tool and e-learning training as well as the benefits, barriers, and challenges to ATTACHTM implementation. Discussion: The proposed study will assess effectiveness and implementation to help understand the delivery of ATTACHTM in community agencies. Trial registration: Name of registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Registration number: NCT04853888. Date of registration: April 22, 2021.

Original languageEnglish
Article number491
JournalBMC Pediatrics
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec. 2022

Keywords

  • ATTACH
  • Child development
  • EIH type 2 clinical trial
  • Normalization process theory
  • Parent-child interaction
  • Parenting program
  • Quasi-experimental design
  • Reflective function
  • Study protocol

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Study protocol for Attachment & Child Health (ATTACHTM) program: promoting vulnerable Children’s health at scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this