Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Simultaneous THEMIS in situ and auroral observations of a small substorm

  • E. Donovan
  • , W. Liu
  • , J. Liang
  • , E. Spanswick
  • , I. Voronkov
  • , M. Connors
  • , M. Syrjäsuo
  • , G. Baker
  • , B. Jackel
  • , T. Trondsen
  • , M. Greffen
  • , V. Angelopoulos
  • , C. T. Russell
  • , S. B. Mende
  • , H. U. Frey
  • , A. Keiling
  • , C. W. Carlson
  • , J. P. McFadden
  • , K. H. Glassmeier
  • , U. Auster
  • K. Hayashi, K. Sakaguchi, K. Shiokawa, J. A. Wild, I. J. Rae
  • University of Calgary
  • Canadian Space Agency
  • Athabasca University
  • Finnish Meteorological Institute
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • Technical University of Braunschweig
  • The University of Tokyo
  • Nagoya University
  • Lancaster University
  • University of Alberta

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present ground-based and in situ observations from March 13, 2007. The THEMIS satellites were in the evening sector conjugate to THEMIS ground-based imagers. At ∼0507 UT there was an optical onset on inner CPS field lines. This involved near-simultaneous brightening of 1 MLT hour longitudinal segment of the onset arc. The part of the arc that brightened was that closest to the equatorward boundary of the diffuse (proton) aurora. Within one minute, a dipolarization front moved across four THEMIS satellites. Based on their locations, the order in which they detected the dipolarization front, and the auroral evolution, we assert that the expansion phase began earthward of the four satellites and evolved radially outwards. We conclude that this onset occurred in an azimuthally localized region of highly stretched field lines.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberL17S18
JournalGeophysical Research Letters
Volume35
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Sep. 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Simultaneous THEMIS in situ and auroral observations of a small substorm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this