TY - CHAP
T1 - Quality Rating and Recommendation of Learning Objects
AU - Kumar, Vivekanandan
AU - Nesbit, John
AU - Winne, Philip
AU - Hadwin, Allyson
AU - Jamieson-Noel, Dianne
AU - Han, Kate
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2007, Springer-Verlag London Limited.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - The unceasing growth of the Internet has led to new modes of learning in which learners routinely interact on-line with instructors, other students, and digital resources. Much recent research has focused on building infrastructure for these activities, especially to facilitate searching, filtering, and recommending on-line resources known as learning objects. Although newly defined standards for learning object metadata are expected to greatly improve searching and filtering capabilities, learners, instructors, and instructional developers may still be faced with choosing from many pages of object listings returned from a single learning object query. The listed objects tend to vary widely in quality. With current metadata and search methods, those who search for learning objects waste time and effort groping through overwhelming masses of information, often finding only poorly designed and developed instructional materials. Hence, there is a clear need for quality evaluations prior to making a recommendation that can be communicated in a coherent, standardized format to measure the quality of learning objects.
AB - The unceasing growth of the Internet has led to new modes of learning in which learners routinely interact on-line with instructors, other students, and digital resources. Much recent research has focused on building infrastructure for these activities, especially to facilitate searching, filtering, and recommending on-line resources known as learning objects. Although newly defined standards for learning object metadata are expected to greatly improve searching and filtering capabilities, learners, instructors, and instructional developers may still be faced with choosing from many pages of object listings returned from a single learning object query. The listed objects tend to vary widely in quality. With current metadata and search methods, those who search for learning objects waste time and effort groping through overwhelming masses of information, often finding only poorly designed and developed instructional materials. Hence, there is a clear need for quality evaluations prior to making a recommendation that can be communicated in a coherent, standardized format to measure the quality of learning objects.
KW - Bayesian Belief Network
KW - Learning Object
KW - Parent Node
KW - Quality Rating
KW - Quality Review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961813446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-1-84628-758-9_12
DO - 10.1007/978-1-84628-758-9_12
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84961813446
T3 - Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing
SP - 337
EP - 373
BT - Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing
ER -