Prim ‘A’ Geniture: Gender Bias and Daughter Successors of Entrepreneurial Family Businesses

Lynn Alison Hamilton, Stefanie Ruel, Janice Lynn Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Entrepreneurs establishing businesses from research and innovation eventually must consider the succession of their firms. Often the enterprise is passed to a family member to continue the vision and legacy of the entrepreneurial founder. While typically the norm of primogeniture dictates that the eldest son is the recipient, today, with changing societal attitudes toward women’s leadership, daughters often find themselves as the firm leader. While some daughters report advantages, others experience significant gender bias in the successor-leader role. Using a critical realist methodology, this exploratory study used interviews from three daughters who were either the successor-leader or were in the process of becoming the successor-leader of a business founded by their father to identify mechanisms within the family, the family business and societal social structures that caused them to experience gender bias. Marxist feminist notions of patriarchy and its roots within the family structure were applied as an a priori theory to identify potential mechanisms that cause gender bias. While this ‘triple patriarchy’ was expected to explain the cause of gender bias, the data suggest that when daughter successors receive validation by their father, any mechanisms that may have caused gender bias are counteracted by others that enable a daughter to be accepted as the successor-leader.

Original languageEnglish
Article number29
JournalFeminist Encounters
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Marxist feminism
  • critical realism
  • daughter succession
  • family business
  • gender bias

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prim ‘A’ Geniture: Gender Bias and Daughter Successors of Entrepreneurial Family Businesses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this