Optimizing the efficacy of learning objectives through pretests

Faria Sana, Noah D. Forrin, Mrinalini Sharma, Tamara Dubljevic, Peter Ho, Ezza Jalil, Joseph A. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Learning objectives (LOs) are statements that typically precede a study session and de-scribe the knowledge students should obtain by the end of the session. Despite their wide-spread use, limited research has investigated the effect of LOs on learning. In three labora-tory experiments, we examined the extent to which LOs improve retention of information. Participants in each experiment read five passages on a neuroscience topic and took a final test that measured how well they retained the information. Presenting LOs before each corresponding passage increased performance on the final test compared with not presenting LOs (experiment 1). Actively presenting LOs increased their pedagogical value: Performance on the final test was highest when participants answered multiple-choice pretest questions compared with when they read traditional LO statements or statements that included target facts (experiment 2). Interestingly, when feedback was provided on pretest responses, performance on the final test decreased, regardless of whether the pre-test format was multiple choice or short answer (experiment 3). Together, these findings suggest that, compared with the passive presentation of LO statements, pretesting (espe-cially without feedback) is a more active method that optimizes learning.

Original languageEnglish
Article number43
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalCBE Life Sciences Education
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing the efficacy of learning objectives through pretests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this