TY - JOUR
T1 - Graduate students’ experiences with research ethics in conducting health research
AU - Petillion, Wendy
AU - Melrose, Sherri
AU - Moore, Sharon L.
AU - Nuttgens, Simon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Graduate students typically first experience research ethics when they submit their masters or doctoral research projects for ethics approval. Research ethics boards in Canada review and grant ethical approval for student research projects and often have to provide additional support to these novice researchers. Previous studies have explored curriculum content, teaching approaches, and the learning environment related to research ethics for graduate students. However, research does not exist that examines students’ actual experience with the research ethics process. Qualitative description was used to explore the research ethics review experience of 11 masters and doctoral students in health discipline programs. Data analysis revealed four themes: curriculum, supervisor support, the ethics application process, and students’ overall experience. The results of this research suggest ideas for enhancing curriculum, deepening students’ relationships with supervisors, and developing the role of research ethics boards to support education for novice researchers. This study contributes to comprehension of the research ethics experience for graduate students and what they value as new researchers.
AB - Graduate students typically first experience research ethics when they submit their masters or doctoral research projects for ethics approval. Research ethics boards in Canada review and grant ethical approval for student research projects and often have to provide additional support to these novice researchers. Previous studies have explored curriculum content, teaching approaches, and the learning environment related to research ethics for graduate students. However, research does not exist that examines students’ actual experience with the research ethics process. Qualitative description was used to explore the research ethics review experience of 11 masters and doctoral students in health discipline programs. Data analysis revealed four themes: curriculum, supervisor support, the ethics application process, and students’ overall experience. The results of this research suggest ideas for enhancing curriculum, deepening students’ relationships with supervisors, and developing the role of research ethics boards to support education for novice researchers. This study contributes to comprehension of the research ethics experience for graduate students and what they value as new researchers.
KW - experience
KW - graduate students
KW - qualitative description
KW - research ethics board
KW - research ethics principles
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038230281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1747016116677635
DO - 10.1177/1747016116677635
M3 - Journal Article
AN - SCOPUS:85038230281
SN - 1747-0161
VL - 13
SP - 139
EP - 154
JO - Research Ethics
JF - Research Ethics
IS - 3-4
ER -