Abstract
Governments in Canada are increasingly using multiple tools to advance their political agenda at the expense of free collective bargaining in the public sector. Legislative intervention has long been a strategy to curtail bargaining rights (Evans et al., 2023). Recently, governments have turned to non-legislative means to influence bargaining outcomes. This article is about the use of a coordination office, a decidedly non-legislative tactic, and how, over two rounds of negotiations, it transformed public-sector bargaining in Alberta. Bargaining has been further transformed by enactment of a legal requirement to keep the government’s mandates secret, the outcome being increased frustration among union representatives and potential damage to long-term relationships. Together, these measures have provided the government with a powerful means of influence, which, if successful, could spread to other jurisdictions.
Original language | Canadian English |
---|---|
Article number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-18 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Relations Industrielle / Industrial Relations |
Volume | 79 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 10 Aug. 2024 |
Keywords
- public-sector collective bargaining; government intervention; permanent exceptionalism