From Advice to “Secret Mandates”: The Evolution of Government Intervention in Public-Sector Bargaining in Alberta, Canada

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Governments in Canada are increasingly using multiple tools to advance their political agenda at the expense of free collective bargaining in the public sector. Legislative intervention has long been a strategy to curtail bargaining rights (Evans et al., 2023). Recently, governments have turned to non-legislative means to influence bargaining outcomes. This article is about the use of a coordination office, a decidedly non-legislative tactic, and how, over two rounds of negotiations, it transformed public-sector bargaining in Alberta. Bargaining has been further transformed by enactment of a legal requirement to keep the government’s mandates secret, the outcome being increased frustration among union representatives and potential damage to long-term relationships. Together, these measures have provided the government with a powerful means of influence, which, if successful, could spread to other jurisdictions.
Original languageCanadian English
Article number1
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalRelations Industrielle / Industrial Relations
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Aug. 2024

Keywords

  • public-sector collective bargaining; government intervention; permanent exceptionalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From Advice to “Secret Mandates”: The Evolution of Government Intervention in Public-Sector Bargaining in Alberta, Canada'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this