Abstract
The increasing use of document reviews in forensic psychology requires that we consider the specific issues that may arise in presenting these in a legal forum, as well as the theoretical and ethical underpinnings that inform such tasks. Recent changes in ethical codes for psychologists seem to suggest a wider scope for document reviews even up to the point of diagnostic for mulations. We suggest some ways to offer such opinions in a balanced, de fensible and objective manner.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-16 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | American Journal of Forensic Psychology |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |