Abstract
The 1990s debate about the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) became polarized between neoliberal globalizers and an impressive, progressive, antineoliberal coalition of trade unions and social movements. By contrast, in the 2018 NAFTA renegotiation debate, while the neoliberal globalizers were still on the stage, this time their opponents were Trump and his team of white-nationalist, Right-wing populist protectionists. For progressive voices to engage with this debate, we need to examine and transcend habits formed in the earlier era, and seriously address the debilitating nonequivalent exchange that structures trade and investment in contemporary capitalism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 65-81 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Studies in Political Economy |
| Volume | 100 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Free trade
- NAFTA
- nonequivalent exchange protectionism
- populism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Finding the Axis of Solidarity: Populist Protectionism and the End of NAFTA: Finding the axis of solidarity: populist protectionism and the end of the North American Free Trade Agreement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver