TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors That Impact the Success of Interorganizational Health Promotion Collaborations
T2 - A Scoping Review
AU - Seaton, Cherisse L.
AU - Holm, Nikolai
AU - Bottorff, Joan L.
AU - Jones-Bricker, Margaret
AU - Errey, Sally
AU - Caperchione, Cristina M.
AU - Lamont, Sonia
AU - Johnson, Steven T.
AU - Healy, Theresa
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the other members of the Harmonization Project team for their collective contributions to this work, including Kerensa Medhurst (BC Cancer Agency), Sean Stolp (University of British Columbia), Haleema Jaffer-Hirji (University of British Columbia), Nancy Viney (Northern Health), El Taylor (BC Cancer Agency, Prevention Programs), Holly Christian (Northern Health), Megan Klitch (Canadian Cancer Society, BC & Yukon Division), Sandra Krueckl (Canadian Cancer Society, BC & Yukon Division), John Oliffe (University of British Columbia), and Kelsey Yarmish (Northern Health). The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Canadian Cancer Society as part of a larger project, the Harmonization Project (grant number 701259-00).
Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Canadian Cancer Society as part of a larger project, the Harmonization Project (grant number 701259-00).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Objective: To explore published empirical literature in order to identify factors that facilitate or inhibit collaborative approaches for health promotion using a scoping review methodology. Data Source: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete for articles published between January 2001 and October 2015 was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: To be included studies had to: be an original research article, published in English, involve at least 2 organizations in a health promotion partnership, and identify factors contributing to or constraining the success of an established (or prior) partnership. Studies were excluded if they focused on primary care collaboration or organizations jointly lobbying for a cause. Data Extraction: Data extraction was completed by 2 members of the author team using a summary chart to extract information relevant to the factors that facilitated or constrained collaboration success. Data Synthesis: NVivo 10 was used to code article content into the thematic categories identified in the data extraction. Results: Twenty-five studies across 8 countries were identified. Several key factors contributed to collaborative effectiveness, including a shared vision, leadership, member characteristics, organizational commitment, available resources, clear roles/responsibilities, trust/clear communication, and engagement of the target population. Conclusion: In general, the findings were consistent with previous reviews; however, additional novel themes did emerge.
AB - Objective: To explore published empirical literature in order to identify factors that facilitate or inhibit collaborative approaches for health promotion using a scoping review methodology. Data Source: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete for articles published between January 2001 and October 2015 was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: To be included studies had to: be an original research article, published in English, involve at least 2 organizations in a health promotion partnership, and identify factors contributing to or constraining the success of an established (or prior) partnership. Studies were excluded if they focused on primary care collaboration or organizations jointly lobbying for a cause. Data Extraction: Data extraction was completed by 2 members of the author team using a summary chart to extract information relevant to the factors that facilitated or constrained collaboration success. Data Synthesis: NVivo 10 was used to code article content into the thematic categories identified in the data extraction. Results: Twenty-five studies across 8 countries were identified. Several key factors contributed to collaborative effectiveness, including a shared vision, leadership, member characteristics, organizational commitment, available resources, clear roles/responsibilities, trust/clear communication, and engagement of the target population. Conclusion: In general, the findings were consistent with previous reviews; however, additional novel themes did emerge.
KW - collaboration
KW - community engagement
KW - health promotion
KW - interorganizational
KW - multistakeholder
KW - partnerships
KW - scoping review
KW - sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041347274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0890117117710875
DO - 10.1177/0890117117710875
M3 - Journal Article
C2 - 28587471
AN - SCOPUS:85041347274
SN - 0890-1171
VL - 32
SP - 1095
EP - 1109
JO - American Journal of Health Promotion
JF - American Journal of Health Promotion
IS - 4
ER -