TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing the integrated science of movement
T2 - bringing together concepts and methods from animal and human movement analysis
AU - Demšar, Urška
AU - Long, Jed A.
AU - Benitez-Paez, Fernando
AU - Brum Bastos, Vanessa
AU - Marion, Solène
AU - Martin, Gina
AU - Sekulić, Sebastijan
AU - Smolak, Kamil
AU - Zein, Beate
AU - Siła-Nowicka, Katarzyna
N1 - Funding Information:
Authors are supported by the Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant (RPG-2018-258), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Advanced Quantitative Methods Scholarship (2017), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Children’s Health Research Institute, the James Hutton Institute, the University of St Andrews, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Auckland and the Western University. We would also like to thank the three anonymous reviewers who have helped us come up with the idea of a general framework that spans disciplines and modelling perspective divide. Further thanks go to handling associate editor Prof Shawn Laffan, for his constructive suggestions and editorial effort.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the The James Hutton Institute [PhD scholarship]; The Leverhulme Trust [Research Project Grant (RPG-2018-258)]; Scottish Graduate School of Social Science/ ESRC [Advanced Quantitative Methods Scholarship]; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [/]; The Children?s Health Research Institute [/]; School of Geography & SD, University of St Andrews [PhD scholarship]; Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences [PhD scholarship], The University of Auckland and The Western University. Authors are supported by the Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant (RPG-2018-258), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Advanced Quantitative Methods Scholarship (2017), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Children?s Health Research Institute, the James Hutton Institute, the University of St Andrews, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Auckland and the Western University. We would also like to thank the three anonymous reviewers who have helped us come up with the idea of a general framework that spans disciplines and modelling perspective divide. Further thanks go to handling associate editor Prof Shawn Laffan, for his constructive suggestions and editorial effort.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Movement analysis has become an integral part of many disciplines, yet with relatively little overlap. A foresight paper in this journal entitled “Towards an integrated science of movement: converging research on animal movement ecology and human mobility science” argued for a better integration of concepts across the divide of animal and human movement, which would lead to the Integrated Science of Movement, but did so from a top-down perspective based on a series of expert workshops. We argue that for a solid establishment of the Integrated Science of Movement, a bottom-up approach is necessary, one based on existing literature which identifies similarities and differences across disciplines. We therefore review, compare, and contrast movement analysis methodologies from GIScience, movement ecology, geography, transportation, public health, computer science, and physics. We structure our review along the dichotomy of individual versus population-based movement or, using terminology from wildlife ecology, between the Lagrangian and Eulerian perspectives. We further introduce a new unifying framework for movement research that is sufficiently general to cover any type of movement study in any discipline and that spans the Lagrangian/Eulerian divide, with the ambitious goal to bridge the gap between disciplines and lay a solid foundation for a new Integrated Science of Movement.
AB - Movement analysis has become an integral part of many disciplines, yet with relatively little overlap. A foresight paper in this journal entitled “Towards an integrated science of movement: converging research on animal movement ecology and human mobility science” argued for a better integration of concepts across the divide of animal and human movement, which would lead to the Integrated Science of Movement, but did so from a top-down perspective based on a series of expert workshops. We argue that for a solid establishment of the Integrated Science of Movement, a bottom-up approach is necessary, one based on existing literature which identifies similarities and differences across disciplines. We therefore review, compare, and contrast movement analysis methodologies from GIScience, movement ecology, geography, transportation, public health, computer science, and physics. We structure our review along the dichotomy of individual versus population-based movement or, using terminology from wildlife ecology, between the Lagrangian and Eulerian perspectives. We further introduce a new unifying framework for movement research that is sufficiently general to cover any type of movement study in any discipline and that spans the Lagrangian/Eulerian divide, with the ambitious goal to bridge the gap between disciplines and lay a solid foundation for a new Integrated Science of Movement.
KW - GIScience
KW - Movement analysis
KW - animal movement
KW - human mobility
KW - interdisciplinary review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101140849&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13658816.2021.1880589
DO - 10.1080/13658816.2021.1880589
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85101140849
SN - 1365-8816
VL - 35
SP - 1273
EP - 1308
JO - International Journal of Geographical Information Science
JF - International Journal of Geographical Information Science
IS - 7
ER -