Abstract
This study addressed the influence of pedometers and a pretest on walking intentions and behaviour. Using a Solomon four-group design, 63 female university students were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: pedometer and pretest (n=16), pedometer and no pretest (n=16), no pedometer and pretest (n=15), no pedometer and no pretest (n=16). The pretest conditions included questions on walking, intentions to walk 12,500 steps per day, and self-efficacy for walking 12,500 steps per day. In the pedometer conditions a Yamax Digi-Walker SW-650 pedometer was worn for one week. All participants completed posttest questions. While significant pretest x pedometer interactions would have indicated the presence of pretest sensitisation, no such interactions were observed for either intention or self-reported walking. Wearing pedometers reduced intentions for future walking and coping self-efficacy. However, after controlling for pretest self-reported walking, pedometer use resulted in more self-reported walking. We conclude that wearing a pedometer increased self-reported walking behaviour but that a pretest did not differentially influence walking intentions, behaviour, or self-efficacy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 777-789 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Psychology and Health |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sep. 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Pedometers
- Physical activity
- Pretest sensitisation
- Social cognitive theories
- Walking
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of pretesting on intentions and behaviour: A pedometer and walking intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver