TY - GEN
T1 - Educating the Educators on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
AU - Mozelius, Peter
AU - Lindqvist, Marcia Håkansson
AU - Cleveland-Innes, Martha
AU - Jaldemark, Jimmy
AU - Sundgren, Marcus
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on AI Research, ICAIR 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In the current spring of Artificial Intelligence, the rapid development of Generative AI (GenAI) has initiated vivid discussions in higher education. Opportunities as well as challenges have been identified and to cope with this new situation there is a need for a large-scale teacher professional development. With basic skills about GenAI teachers could use the new technology as an extension of the existing technology enhanced teaching and learning. The aim of this paper is to present and discuss the project FAITH (Frontline Application of AI and Technology-enhanced Learning for Transforming Higher Education). FAITH is a higher education pedagogical development initiative for institutional development for teachers with good fundamental skills in traditional pedagogy. A project with the overall objective of increasing the staff understanding of AI and to develop new competencies in the field of GenAI and technology enhanced learning. The research question that guided this study was: "What are the perceived opportunities, challenges and expectations of involving GenAI in higher education?" The overall research strategy for the FAITH project is design-based research, which involves iterative and cumulative development processes. In the early iteration that this study was a part of has been carried out inspired by Collective Autoethnography where members of the steering group behind the FAITH project, and members of the project team have constituted the main focus group. Data were collected by structured interviews where two GenAI tools also have been interviewed. Findings show that the expectations are high, but that the FAITH ambition of institutional development is depending on teachers’ motivation for taking an active part in the project. Another challenge could be that many teachers see GenAI as something that threatens the current course design, and that a general ban of GenAI is the appropriate solution. One of, several identified opportunities, is that a general revision of syllabi and assessment in an adaptation for GenAI enhanced learning would improve the current course design.
AB - In the current spring of Artificial Intelligence, the rapid development of Generative AI (GenAI) has initiated vivid discussions in higher education. Opportunities as well as challenges have been identified and to cope with this new situation there is a need for a large-scale teacher professional development. With basic skills about GenAI teachers could use the new technology as an extension of the existing technology enhanced teaching and learning. The aim of this paper is to present and discuss the project FAITH (Frontline Application of AI and Technology-enhanced Learning for Transforming Higher Education). FAITH is a higher education pedagogical development initiative for institutional development for teachers with good fundamental skills in traditional pedagogy. A project with the overall objective of increasing the staff understanding of AI and to develop new competencies in the field of GenAI and technology enhanced learning. The research question that guided this study was: "What are the perceived opportunities, challenges and expectations of involving GenAI in higher education?" The overall research strategy for the FAITH project is design-based research, which involves iterative and cumulative development processes. In the early iteration that this study was a part of has been carried out inspired by Collective Autoethnography where members of the steering group behind the FAITH project, and members of the project team have constituted the main focus group. Data were collected by structured interviews where two GenAI tools also have been interviewed. Findings show that the expectations are high, but that the FAITH ambition of institutional development is depending on teachers’ motivation for taking an active part in the project. Another challenge could be that many teachers see GenAI as something that threatens the current course design, and that a general ban of GenAI is the appropriate solution. One of, several identified opportunities, is that a general revision of syllabi and assessment in an adaptation for GenAI enhanced learning would improve the current course design.
KW - AIED
KW - Artificial intelligence in education
KW - GenAI
KW - Higher education
KW - Teacher professional development
KW - Transformation of higher education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215687503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Published Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85215687503
T3 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on AI Research, ICAIR 2024
SP - 296
EP - 302
BT - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on AI Research, ICAIR 2024
A2 - Goncalves, Carlos
A2 - Rouco, Jose Carlos Dias
T2 - 4th International Conference on AI Research, ICAIR 2024
Y2 - 5 December 2024 through 6 December 2024
ER -