Educating the Educators on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

Peter Mozelius, Marcia Håkansson Lindqvist, Martha Cleveland-Innes, Jimmy Jaldemark, Marcus Sundgren

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPublished Conference contributionpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In the current spring of Artificial Intelligence, the rapid development of Generative AI (GenAI) has initiated vivid discussions in higher education. Opportunities as well as challenges have been identified and to cope with this new situation there is a need for a large-scale teacher professional development. With basic skills about GenAI teachers could use the new technology as an extension of the existing technology enhanced teaching and learning. The aim of this paper is to present and discuss the project FAITH (Frontline Application of AI and Technology-enhanced Learning for Transforming Higher Education). FAITH is a higher education pedagogical development initiative for institutional development for teachers with good fundamental skills in traditional pedagogy. A project with the overall objective of increasing the staff understanding of AI and to develop new competencies in the field of GenAI and technology enhanced learning. The research question that guided this study was: "What are the perceived opportunities, challenges and expectations of involving GenAI in higher education?" The overall research strategy for the FAITH project is design-based research, which involves iterative and cumulative development processes. In the early iteration that this study was a part of has been carried out inspired by Collective Autoethnography where members of the steering group behind the FAITH project, and members of the project team have constituted the main focus group. Data were collected by structured interviews where two GenAI tools also have been interviewed. Findings show that the expectations are high, but that the FAITH ambition of institutional development is depending on teachers’ motivation for taking an active part in the project. Another challenge could be that many teachers see GenAI as something that threatens the current course design, and that a general ban of GenAI is the appropriate solution. One of, several identified opportunities, is that a general revision of syllabi and assessment in an adaptation for GenAI enhanced learning would improve the current course design.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 4th International Conference on AI Research, ICAIR 2024
EditorsCarlos Goncalves, Jose Carlos Dias Rouco
Pages296-302
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9798331309466
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Event4th International Conference on AI Research, ICAIR 2024 - Lisbon, Portugal
Duration: 5 Dec. 20246 Dec. 2024

Publication series

NameProceedings of the 4th International Conference on AI Research, ICAIR 2024

Conference

Conference4th International Conference on AI Research, ICAIR 2024
Country/TerritoryPortugal
CityLisbon
Period5/12/246/12/24

Keywords

  • AIED
  • Artificial intelligence in education
  • GenAI
  • Higher education
  • Teacher professional development
  • Transformation of higher education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Educating the Educators on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this