Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diversity and stratification of international authorship and knowledge production in published management and business research

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Scholarly publishing of research on management and business topics is organized in a stratified organizational field, where limited access to authorship and homogenized research practices are institutionalized in a metricized system of quality assessment that amplifies inequality. The system privileges authors from core regions of a knowledge network and favors Western norms of knowledge production. This article explores diversity and stratification in 16 management research journals grouped into four different tiers, comparing subscription print journals and Open Access publishing across two grades of quality status. Analysis of authorship location and the use of normative Western research practices provides evidence that inequality is pervasive in the field. It is suggested that management scholars, journal editors, and universities can counteract inequality by initiating global research collaborations that engage deeply with the context of diverse forms of scholarship and knowledge and aim to disseminate in diversified publication outlets.

Original languageEnglish
JournalManagement Learning
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2026

Keywords

  • Diversity
  • inequality
  • journal metrics
  • management research
  • open access journals
  • predatory journals
  • research context
  • scholarly publishing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diversity and stratification of international authorship and knowledge production in published management and business research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this