TY - JOUR
T1 - Digital well-being begins with inclusion
T2 - A systematic review of videoconferencing guidelines for equitable learning
AU - Heiser, Rebecca E.
AU - Palalas, Agnieszka
AU - Gollert, Ashley
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Articles published in the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant AJET right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - As higher education institutions increasingly adopt videoconferencing technologies to broaden access to learning, the need for evidence-based, inclusive practices to support digital well-being becomes paramount. Integrating these technologies into the curriculum necessitates careful design considerations to prevent unintended consequences and uphold learners’ privacy, safety, equity and humanity. Our systematic review, based on eight dimensions of digital wellness, has identified key inclusive design decisions for videoconference-enabled formal learning experiences. Drawing from data analysed from 36 empirical studies, we organised six inclusive design considerations for digital wellness in videoconferencing learning environments. These considerations – accessibility, active learning strategies, multimodal communication, readiness, social presence and sociocultural sensitivity – offer course designers a practical framework to create evidence-based practices that foster digital wellness and inclusion in videoconferencing learning spaces. Implications for practice or policy: • Academic institutions should recognise digital wellness as a shared responsibility among institutional stakeholders, including faculty, learners, and administrative professionals. • Institutional policies should prioritise learner choice and equitable access for co-creating knowledge and fostering safe communication. • Stakeholders should be empowered to make informed choices about digital habits to mitigate unintended consequences and encourage mindful technology use. • Accessibility barriers must be addressed through intentional learning design, ensuring meaningful participation and interaction for all.
AB - As higher education institutions increasingly adopt videoconferencing technologies to broaden access to learning, the need for evidence-based, inclusive practices to support digital well-being becomes paramount. Integrating these technologies into the curriculum necessitates careful design considerations to prevent unintended consequences and uphold learners’ privacy, safety, equity and humanity. Our systematic review, based on eight dimensions of digital wellness, has identified key inclusive design decisions for videoconference-enabled formal learning experiences. Drawing from data analysed from 36 empirical studies, we organised six inclusive design considerations for digital wellness in videoconferencing learning environments. These considerations – accessibility, active learning strategies, multimodal communication, readiness, social presence and sociocultural sensitivity – offer course designers a practical framework to create evidence-based practices that foster digital wellness and inclusion in videoconferencing learning spaces. Implications for practice or policy: • Academic institutions should recognise digital wellness as a shared responsibility among institutional stakeholders, including faculty, learners, and administrative professionals. • Institutional policies should prioritise learner choice and equitable access for co-creating knowledge and fostering safe communication. • Stakeholders should be empowered to make informed choices about digital habits to mitigate unintended consequences and encourage mindful technology use. • Accessibility barriers must be addressed through intentional learning design, ensuring meaningful participation and interaction for all.
KW - digital wellness
KW - higher education
KW - inclusive design
KW - systematic review
KW - videoconferencing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003503336
U2 - 10.14742/ajet.9552
DO - 10.14742/ajet.9552
M3 - Journal Article
AN - SCOPUS:105003503336
VL - 41
SP - 18-56.
JO - Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
JF - Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
IS - 1
ER -