TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitively Impaired Older Adults
T2 - Risk Profiles for Istitutionalization
AU - Strain, Laurel A.
AU - Blandford, Audrey A.
AU - Mitchell, Lori A.
AU - Hawranik, Pamela G.
PY - 2003/12
Y1 - 2003/12
N2 - Background: This study focused on the identification of risk profiles for institutionalization among older adults diagnosed with cognitive impairment-not dementia or dementia in 1991/92 and subsequent institutionalization in the following 5-year period. Methods: Data were from a sample of 123 individuals aged 65+ and their unpaid caregivers in Manitoba, Canada. Cluster analysis was conducted using baseline characteristics of age, cognition, disruptive behaviors, ADLs/IADLs, use of formal in-home services, and level of caregiver burden. Results: Three distinct groups emerged (high risk [n = 12], medium risk [n = 40], and low risk [n = 71]). The high-risk group had the poorest cognitive scores, were the most likely to exhibit disruptive behaviors, were the most likely to need assistance with ADLs and IADLs, and had the highest level of burden among their caregivers. Follow-up of the groups validated the risk profiles; 75% of the high-risk group were institutionalized within the next 5 years, compared to 45% of the medium-risk group and 21% of the low-risk group. Discussion: The risk profiles highlight the diversity among individuals with cognitive impairment and the opportunity for differential targeting of services for the distinct needs of each group.
AB - Background: This study focused on the identification of risk profiles for institutionalization among older adults diagnosed with cognitive impairment-not dementia or dementia in 1991/92 and subsequent institutionalization in the following 5-year period. Methods: Data were from a sample of 123 individuals aged 65+ and their unpaid caregivers in Manitoba, Canada. Cluster analysis was conducted using baseline characteristics of age, cognition, disruptive behaviors, ADLs/IADLs, use of formal in-home services, and level of caregiver burden. Results: Three distinct groups emerged (high risk [n = 12], medium risk [n = 40], and low risk [n = 71]). The high-risk group had the poorest cognitive scores, were the most likely to exhibit disruptive behaviors, were the most likely to need assistance with ADLs and IADLs, and had the highest level of burden among their caregivers. Follow-up of the groups validated the risk profiles; 75% of the high-risk group were institutionalized within the next 5 years, compared to 45% of the medium-risk group and 21% of the low-risk group. Discussion: The risk profiles highlight the diversity among individuals with cognitive impairment and the opportunity for differential targeting of services for the distinct needs of each group.
KW - Cognitive impairment
KW - Dementia
KW - Institutionalization
KW - Nursing home placement
KW - Older adults
KW - Risk factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0442309320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1041610203009608
DO - 10.1017/S1041610203009608
M3 - Journal Article
C2 - 15000415
AN - SCOPUS:0442309320
SN - 1041-6102
VL - 15
SP - 351
EP - 366
JO - International Psychogeriatrics
JF - International Psychogeriatrics
IS - 4
ER -