TY - JOUR
T1 - An exploratory study of project success with tools, software and methods
AU - Jugdev, Kam
AU - Perkins, David
AU - Fortune, Joyce
AU - White, Diana
AU - Walker, Derek
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013, © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
PY - 2013/6/14
Y1 - 2013/6/14
N2 - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the relationships between project delivery success factors, project management tools, software, and methods. Design/methodology/approachA statistical analysis was undertaken using data from a survey from a purposive sample of 150 participants across three countries (Australia, Canada and the UK). The findings were used to consider the relationships between project success factors, project management tools, software, and methods. FindingsThe findings reveal certain insights in the use of tools and methodologies. Of all the variables measured, the number of project management tools used and the number of risk tools used showed the highest direct correlation. It was therefore surmised that the use of tools from one of these categories is often coincident with the use of tools from the other category. Also, the use of project management tools exhibited less variability as compared to use of information communication technology support tools and risk management tools. In addition, use of formal project management methods exhibited less variability than use of formal decision-making methods. Therefore, it is suggested that use of project management tools and methods is more consistent across the organizations studied, as compared to other tools and methods. Originality/valueThis paper extends the survey findings of an international 2011 study and sheds light on the use of project management and related tools and methods.
AB - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the relationships between project delivery success factors, project management tools, software, and methods. Design/methodology/approachA statistical analysis was undertaken using data from a survey from a purposive sample of 150 participants across three countries (Australia, Canada and the UK). The findings were used to consider the relationships between project success factors, project management tools, software, and methods. FindingsThe findings reveal certain insights in the use of tools and methodologies. Of all the variables measured, the number of project management tools used and the number of risk tools used showed the highest direct correlation. It was therefore surmised that the use of tools from one of these categories is often coincident with the use of tools from the other category. Also, the use of project management tools exhibited less variability as compared to use of information communication technology support tools and risk management tools. In addition, use of formal project management methods exhibited less variability than use of formal decision-making methods. Therefore, it is suggested that use of project management tools and methods is more consistent across the organizations studied, as compared to other tools and methods. Originality/valueThis paper extends the survey findings of an international 2011 study and sheds light on the use of project management and related tools and methods.
KW - Australia
KW - Canada
KW - Computer software
KW - Control
KW - Methods
KW - Project management
KW - Project success
KW - Risk management
KW - Techniques and tools
KW - United Kingdom
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911020724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/IJMPB-08-2012-0051
DO - 10.1108/IJMPB-08-2012-0051
M3 - Journal Article
AN - SCOPUS:84911020724
SN - 1753-8378
VL - 6
SP - 534
EP - 551
JO - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
JF - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
IS - 3
ER -